Innovation in health service delivery: integrating community health assitants into the health system at district level in Zambia

Below is the citation and abstract of a new paper in the open-access journal BMC Health Services Research. Underneath I have added some illustrative quotes from participants in the research. This is a crucial subject and I have invited the authors to join us and explore further on HIFA-Zambia.

CITATION: Innovation in health service delivery: integrating community health assitants into the health system at district level in Zambia

by Joseph Mumba Zulu, Anna-Karin Hurtig, John Kinsman et al.

BMC Health Services Research 2015, 15:38 (28 January 2015)

ABSTRACT

Background: To address the huge human resources for health gap in Zambia, the Ministry of Health launched the National Community Health Assistant Strategy in 2010. The strategy aims to integrate community-based health workers into the health system by creating a new group of workers, called community health assistants (CHAs).

However, literature suggests that the integration process of national community-based health worker programmes into health systems has not been optimal. Conceptually informed by the diffusion of innovations theory, this paper qualitatively aimed to explore the factors that shaped the acceptability and adoption of CHAs into the health system at district level in Zambia during the pilot phase.

Methods: Data gathered through review of documents, 6 focus group discussions with community leaders, and 12 key informant interviews with CHA trainers, supervisors and members of the District Health Management Team were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The perceived relative advantage of CHAs over existing community-based health workers in terms of their quality of training and scope of responsibilities, and the perceived compatibility of CHAs with existing groups of health workers and community healthcare expectations positively facilitated the integration process.

However, limited integration of CHAs in the district health governance system hindered effective programme trialability, simplicity and observability at district level. Specific challenges at this level included a limited information flow and sense of programme ownership, and insufficient documentation of outcomes. The district also had difficulties in responding to emergent challenges such as delayed or non-payment of CHA incentives, as well as inadequate supervision and involvement of CHAs in the health posts where they are supposed to be working. Furthermore, failure of the health system to secure regular drug supplies affected health service delivery and acceptability of CHA services at community level.

Conclusion: The study has demonstrated that implementation of policy guidelines for integrating community-based health workers in the health system may not automatically guarantee successful integration at the local or district level, at least at the start of the process. The study reiterates the need for fully integrating such innovations into the district health governance system if they are to be effective.

QUOTES

“The most important thing to remember is that unlike the training for the other community health workers, the CHA’s training is longer…. It runs for 1 year.” (Neighbourhood health committee FGD 1, female participant 2).

“We have two CHAs who were trained. But to our surprise, they are not allowed to give medicines. They just watch support staff give medicines.” (Neighbourhood health committee FGD 2, male participant 1).

“But the complaint in the community is that CHAs are unable to treat some illnesses like malaria as they do not have drug kits.” (Neighbourhood health committee FGD 5, male participant 1).

“Sometimes CHAs come and ask for antibiotics to use. But am a little sceptical giving them drugs to administer because I don’t know the extent of their training.” (CHA supervisor 2, male).

“We are still waiting for monitors to come from the national level so that we can share with them some of challenges that we are experiencing in supervising CHAs.” CHA supervisor 4, female).

“We have been told that CHAs are under the Ministry of Health, but unlike other health workers, they are also controlled by the other groups. We are therefore not sure if they are totally under the Ministry of Health.” (CHA supervisor 3, female).

Best wishes, Neil

Let’s build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare knowledge – Join HIFA: www.hifa2015.org  

The Ebola Pocket Library

The post below is from Health Information Updates to and from Africa, led by Partnerships in Health Information.

http://jeanshawphi.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/the-ebola-pocket-library-v-1-1/

More info here:

http://widernet.unc.edu/research/ebolalibrary/

Subject: [New post] The Ebola Pocket Library v.1.1

The Ebola Pocket Library v.1.1

by cmsengezi  

The WiderNet Project and WiderNet@UNC have developed the Ebola Pocket Library as a free-to-copy digital off-line library for people responding to the Ebola crisis in Africa — especially local health care workers in Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone.

This collection includes high-quality digital resources for everyone from physicians and researchers to families, teachers, social workers, media outlets, and school children.

Providing accurate and timely Ebola information to health care and public health workers as well as community leaders and individuals — no Internet required.

Access and more information

Chipo Msengezi                     ITOCA

Let’s build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare knowledge – Join HIFA: www.hifa2015.org  

…..

A handy summary map collecting the history of Ebola is available for free here:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/30/science/history-of-ebola-in-24-outbreaks.html?smid=tw-nytimes&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Science&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=Multimedia

Click on the rings to get details (numbers of cases and deaths, suspected source and type of Ebola strain) about each virus outbreak.

Chris

………

We understand the controversy regarding the need for urgent fluid and electrolyte placement versus the dangers to health workers of placing intravenous cannula in patients with Ebola in low resource settings. We remain of the view that insufficient levels of hospital-level resources providing adequate ethical and evidence-based treatments are being made available to West African patients.  MSF (Doctors without borders) have done more than any other organization to provide treatments for this terrible disease and rather than criticizing them, the health and donor communities from well-resourced countries should provide more appropriate and adequately equipped facilities in which health workers can safely work.

We stated the following in a blog post in the British Medical Journal two months ago http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/11/13/david-southall-and-rhona-macdonald-more-resources-are-urgently-needed-to-treat-ebola-in-west-africa/

‘Although national and international health workers are doing their best to provide humane care to west African patients in existing Ebola isolation and treatment units, according to our personal experience in Liberia, too few of them are able to provide treatment of a minimum international and medically ethical standard for a disease with a potential 70% survival rate.

Treatments with appropriate oral, intravenous, or intraosseous electrolyte solutions; blood products; anti-emetics; antacids; and adequate analgesia (including morphine when needed), all supported by carefully documented vital signs and basic laboratory measurements, are essential. The focus must be on ethically adequate medical treatment, not just isolation, and must include adequate nutrition.’

In their article in the Lancet in December 2014, Ian Roberts and Anders Perner provide further support for the need for providing effective, evidence-based, management for the severe dehydration and electrolyte imbalance that is a hallmark of Ebola http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2962316-3.pdf

Here is a link to the section on intraosseous emergency fluid replacement (from our new textbook on the hospital care of pregnant women, newborn infants and children in low resource settings) http://www.mcai.org.uk/#!textbook-for-hospitals/c1sd8

explaining in detail how to undertake this procedure, which we hope you find useful. http://media.wix.com/ugd/dd2ba4_7e7738ff635b4a399fca9924708c3451.pdf

And of course, other components of high dependency care for patients with Ebola such as adequate analgesia, (as outlined in our BMJ blog http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/11/13/david-southall-and-rhona-macdonald-more-resources-are-urgently-needed-to-treat-ebola-in-west-africa/ ) are also vital and ethically warranted.

Professor David Southall OBE, MD, FRCPCH and Dr Rhona MacDonald MBChB, MRCGP, MPH, DCH, DRCOG  

Honorary Medical and Executive Directors.  Maternal and Childhealth Advocacy International: MCAI, 1 Columba Court, Laide IV22 2NL, UK

0044 (0) 7710 674003  www.mcai.org.uk and www.ihpi.org

HIFA profile: David Southall is a retired Professor of Paediatrics and Honorary Medical Director of Maternal and Childhealth Advocacy International (MCAI)    http://www.mcai.org.uk    He is also on the board of the International Child Health Group email: director AT mcai.org.uk

……….

The January 2015 issue of the Bulletin of the World Health Organization is now freely available http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/1/en/

I would like to quote from the editorial ‘The Ebola epidemic: a transformative moment for global health’, by Stephen B Kennedy & Richard A Nisbett:

http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/1/14-151068.pdf

‘As we endeavour to combine biomedicine and social medicine to create a trans-disciplinary workforce for the Ebola frontline, we must ensure that our efforts are focused on the people, households and communities at risk. If we are to achieve any global health goals, we must empower the marginalized and voiceless. In the era of globalized supply chains and rapid transportation across very porous borders, it is in our self-interest to recognize our interdependence.’

The emergence and rapid spread of Ebola is widely recognised as a failure of health systems in general. More specifically, as HIFA Steering Group member Martin Carroll argued at the World Health Summit in Berlin in October, it is a collective failure of the global healthcare information system: health research, publishing, information services & health education.

HIFA is a trans-disciplinary platform to address the global health challenge of improving the availability and use of healthcare information. Our message to the international community is that the Ebola epidemic should be seen as a wake-up call not only to strengthen health systems in general, but also (more particularly and more achievable) to strengthen activities to meet the health information needs of frontline health workers, citizens and policymakers.  

The authors of the editorial make another important point: ‘we must empower the marginalized and voiceless’. I would like to challenge all HIFA members to consider ways we can better engage and listen to the voices of those who are currently underrepresented on HIFA (eg community health workers, citizens, patients, patient representatives…).

Best wishes,

Neil

Let’s build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare knowledge – Join HIFA: www.hifa2015.org